<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Alexandra Highcrest Magazine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alexandrahighcrest.com/blog/index.php/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alexandrahighcrest.com/blog</link>
	<description>I used to work in fashion, then I took an arrow to the knee.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 02:36:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Model, the Murderer, and Blood Diamonds by organic seo companies</title>
		<link>http://alexandrahighcrest.com/blog/2010/07/22/the-model-the-murderer-and-blood-diamonds/comment-page-1/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>organic seo companies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 01:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexandrahighcrest.com/blog/?p=2026#comment-54</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Just read this ......&lt;/strong&gt;

some really marvelous work on behalf of the owner of this internet site , absolutely great subject material</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Just read this &#8230;&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>some really marvelous work on behalf of the owner of this internet site , absolutely great subject material</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Damn Heels Looks Like a Damn Knockoff by RWelch</title>
		<link>http://alexandrahighcrest.com/blog/2010/04/29/damn-heels-looks-like-a-damn-knockoff/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>RWelch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 15:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexandrahighcrest.com/blog/?p=1997#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Okay, so you say Rollasoles were finally hitting their stride in summer 2009, and yet Haley &quot;ripped off&quot; the idea and launched Damn Heels in December of that same year?
Wow. That&#039;s pretty quick.
I mean, businesses take a while to get off the ground. Pretty impressive that she could rip it off that quickly. Especially considering the walk home that inspired the idea for Haley happened in 2007...it&#039;s almost as if the idea had been brewing for a lot longer than just a few months! Hmmm...(note the sarcasm)
Also: do you understand the way business works? Let&#039;s just say that Haley did &quot;steal&quot; the idea (which I doubt she did, by the way, seeing as she got the idea for the product a full year before Rollasoles was even a thought). When a company sees a product that they think they can improve on, THEY DO IT. That&#039;s the way to make money. Do you also think that Windows ripped off Mac (I mean, Mac launched in January 1984, Windows in November 1985!)? That&#039;s not such a big deal, though, is it? Because the products are in competition with each other. There are differences between the two, and they&#039;ll constantly be one-upping each other and appealing to different markets. That&#039;s how it works. There a million similar products out there, and they&#039;re all constantly improving on products that already exist to make money.
Besides that, ideas CAN co-exist. I go back to Windows and Mac. They&#039;re both good operating systems, both appealing to different markets. Just because they came out within a similar time frame, does that mean one MUST HAVE stolen from another? Is it so hard to believe that two people out of the 6 billion people in the world had a similar train of thought?
Sorry, but this is just bad, biased journalism. You&#039;ve presented a coincidence in an attempt to, what, sully this young entrepreneur&#039;s success? Appear oh so clever? I don&#039;t mean to sound rude, but I can&#039;t stand it when people try to take away the originality and hard work behind other people&#039;s work. It&#039;s rude and unnecessary. (Especially in this case, since I&#039;m of the firm belief that Damn Heels are actually an improvement on Rollasoles on several levels, including storability and reusablility.)
Next time, after you do your homework, use your logic, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, so you say Rollasoles were finally hitting their stride in summer 2009, and yet Haley &#8220;ripped off&#8221; the idea and launched Damn Heels in December of that same year?<br />
Wow. That&#8217;s pretty quick.<br />
I mean, businesses take a while to get off the ground. Pretty impressive that she could rip it off that quickly. Especially considering the walk home that inspired the idea for Haley happened in 2007&#8230;it&#8217;s almost as if the idea had been brewing for a lot longer than just a few months! Hmmm&#8230;(note the sarcasm)<br />
Also: do you understand the way business works? Let&#8217;s just say that Haley did &#8220;steal&#8221; the idea (which I doubt she did, by the way, seeing as she got the idea for the product a full year before Rollasoles was even a thought). When a company sees a product that they think they can improve on, THEY DO IT. That&#8217;s the way to make money. Do you also think that Windows ripped off Mac (I mean, Mac launched in January 1984, Windows in November 1985!)? That&#8217;s not such a big deal, though, is it? Because the products are in competition with each other. There are differences between the two, and they&#8217;ll constantly be one-upping each other and appealing to different markets. That&#8217;s how it works. There a million similar products out there, and they&#8217;re all constantly improving on products that already exist to make money.<br />
Besides that, ideas CAN co-exist. I go back to Windows and Mac. They&#8217;re both good operating systems, both appealing to different markets. Just because they came out within a similar time frame, does that mean one MUST HAVE stolen from another? Is it so hard to believe that two people out of the 6 billion people in the world had a similar train of thought?<br />
Sorry, but this is just bad, biased journalism. You&#8217;ve presented a coincidence in an attempt to, what, sully this young entrepreneur&#8217;s success? Appear oh so clever? I don&#8217;t mean to sound rude, but I can&#8217;t stand it when people try to take away the originality and hard work behind other people&#8217;s work. It&#8217;s rude and unnecessary. (Especially in this case, since I&#8217;m of the firm belief that Damn Heels are actually an improvement on Rollasoles on several levels, including storability and reusablility.)<br />
Next time, after you do your homework, use your logic, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Damn Heels Looks Like a Damn Knockoff by Alexandra Highcrest</title>
		<link>http://alexandrahighcrest.com/blog/2010/04/29/damn-heels-looks-like-a-damn-knockoff/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexandra Highcrest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2010 05:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexandrahighcrest.com/blog/?p=1997#comment-24</guid>
		<description>These products did not appear simultaneously in different markets, the American knock-offs appeared in the summer of 2009, after Horan’s original surfaced and succeeded. Hailey Coleman launched her company in December 2009.

There is no fabrication in this story; the information is available to anyone who chooses to look. All I&#039;ve done is sewn the threads together and came to a logical conclusion.

Any product can be knocked off, luxe or not. From the Oxford, “knock-off: a copy or imitation made especially for commercial gain.” The key words in the definition are “for commercial gain,” the definition makes no specific reference to luxury goods.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These products did not appear simultaneously in different markets, the American knock-offs appeared in the summer of 2009, after Horan’s original surfaced and succeeded. Hailey Coleman launched her company in December 2009.</p>
<p>There is no fabrication in this story; the information is available to anyone who chooses to look. All I&#8217;ve done is sewn the threads together and came to a logical conclusion.</p>
<p>Any product can be knocked off, luxe or not. From the Oxford, “knock-off: a copy or imitation made especially for commercial gain.” The key words in the definition are “for commercial gain,” the definition makes no specific reference to luxury goods.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Damn Heels Looks Like a Damn Knockoff by monster</title>
		<link>http://alexandrahighcrest.com/blog/2010/04/29/damn-heels-looks-like-a-damn-knockoff/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>monster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 21:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexandrahighcrest.com/blog/?p=1997#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Is it not possible that two like-minded individuals could conceive of this brilliant idea, unknowingly and irrespective of one another? Innovation and response to market demand can, and should, occur in tandem; multiple products arriving simultaneously in different markets serves only as evidence that these products are tremendously valuable, and that young innovators are thinking alike and responding to current consumer desires. This article is poor, fabricated journalism, founded on negative and fallacious assumptions, and serves only to slander and denigrate the work of this young Canadian entrepreneur by implying that she has misappropriated the idea as opposed to conceptualizing of the product herself. Rather disappointing, indeed. Even the interpretation of “knock-off” stated in this article is utterly erroneous, for a “knock-off” is, by definition, a copy of imitation of an expensive or luxury good. I do believe this renders even the title nonsensical. Please, do your homework next time, and give us something more than this fragment of lazy, misguided and damaging journalism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it not possible that two like-minded individuals could conceive of this brilliant idea, unknowingly and irrespective of one another? Innovation and response to market demand can, and should, occur in tandem; multiple products arriving simultaneously in different markets serves only as evidence that these products are tremendously valuable, and that young innovators are thinking alike and responding to current consumer desires. This article is poor, fabricated journalism, founded on negative and fallacious assumptions, and serves only to slander and denigrate the work of this young Canadian entrepreneur by implying that she has misappropriated the idea as opposed to conceptualizing of the product herself. Rather disappointing, indeed. Even the interpretation of “knock-off” stated in this article is utterly erroneous, for a “knock-off” is, by definition, a copy of imitation of an expensive or luxury good. I do believe this renders even the title nonsensical. Please, do your homework next time, and give us something more than this fragment of lazy, misguided and damaging journalism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Damn Heels Looks Like a Damn Knockoff by Red carpet leads to gold for Damn Heels &#171; Puiyee Tang&#39;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://alexandrahighcrest.com/blog/2010/04/29/damn-heels-looks-like-a-damn-knockoff/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Red carpet leads to gold for Damn Heels &#171; Puiyee Tang&#39;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 07:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexandrahighcrest.com/blog/?p=1997#comment-22</guid>
		<description>[...] http://alexandrahighcrest.com/blog/2010/04/29/damn-heels-looks-like-a-damn-knockoff/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://alexandrahighcrest.com/blog/2010/04/29/damn-heels-looks-like-a-damn-knockoff/" rel="nofollow">http://alexandrahighcrest.com/blog/2010/04/29/damn-heels-looks-like-a-damn-knockoff/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ibogaine; The End Of Heroin Withdrawal? by iboga</title>
		<link>http://alexandrahighcrest.com/blog/2010/03/13/ibogaine-the-end-of-heroin-withdrawal/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>iboga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 17:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexandrahighcrest.com/blog/?p=1866#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the great article.
 
You can learn more about ibogaine by visiting 

http://www.ibogaine.org   and

http://www.ibogaine-treatment.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the great article.</p>
<p>You can learn more about ibogaine by visiting </p>
<p><a href="http://www.ibogaine.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.ibogaine.org</a>   and</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ibogaine-treatment.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.ibogaine-treatment.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Snapping for SWAG by Smojoe Updates for October 2009 at SMOjoe.com</title>
		<link>http://alexandrahighcrest.com/blog/2009/09/28/snapping-for-swag/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Smojoe Updates for October 2009 at SMOjoe.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexandrahighcrest.com/blog/?p=1391#comment-12</guid>
		<description>[...] images. A half dozen local bloggers have written about the photo contest and the best posts are Alexandra Highcrest, Snapping for Swag and&#8230; more to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] images. A half dozen local bloggers have written about the photo contest and the best posts are Alexandra Highcrest, Snapping for Swag and&#8230; more to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on America&#8217;s First Fashion Icon by America’s First Fashion Icon &#124; Fashion e Music Blog</title>
		<link>http://alexandrahighcrest.com/blog/2009/09/18/americas-first-fashion-icon/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>America’s First Fashion Icon &#124; Fashion e Music Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 23:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexandrahighcrest.com/blog/?p=1301#comment-11</guid>
		<description>[...] See the rest here: America’s First Fashion Icon [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See the rest here: America’s First Fashion Icon [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ban Photoshopping; Save the Children by America hates Curls. &#171; Curly Cues and Strife</title>
		<link>http://alexandrahighcrest.com/blog/2009/08/11/ban-photoshopping-save-the-children/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>America hates Curls. &#171; Curly Cues and Strife</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 21:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexandrahighcrest.com/blog/?p=945#comment-9</guid>
		<description>[...] and hot rollers? With steps being taken to halt the media from excessively photoshopping images (thank you UK) in order to promote a better self-image for young girls, maybe it is time to also start showing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and hot rollers? With steps being taken to halt the media from excessively photoshopping images (thank you UK) in order to promote a better self-image for young girls, maybe it is time to also start showing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on This Summer&#8217;s Ugliest Pants by The CANADIAN DESIGN RESOURCE &#187; Kurta Pants</title>
		<link>http://alexandrahighcrest.com/blog/2009/06/10/this-summers-ugliest-pants/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>The CANADIAN DESIGN RESOURCE &#187; Kurta Pants</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexandrahighcrest.com/blog/?p=349#comment-8</guid>
		<description>[...] have sparked lots of talk about the return of ‘hammer pants’ (here&#8217;s one example and here&#8217;s another). Still, despite the proclaimations this silhouette has not seen a lot of wide spread acceptance. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have sparked lots of talk about the return of ‘hammer pants’ (here&#8217;s one example and here&#8217;s another). Still, despite the proclaimations this silhouette has not seen a lot of wide spread acceptance. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

